Quality Management
High-Risk AI Quality Management System
What this control does
Maintain a documented QMS integrating regulatory strategy, lifecycle controls, data, risk, monitoring, incidents, records and accountability.
How to implement
For a high-risk AI provider, document how the quality management system (QMS) controls the actual lifecycle of its AI systems. Assign responsibilities for design, changes, data, testing, regulatory communication, records and resources. Connect these procedures to risk management, post-market monitoring and serious-incident reporting. Use reviews to track unresolved gaps and test whether procedures are followed. Coordinate with an existing sectoral QMS where permitted, but verify the conditions for any simplified or equivalent arrangements. The accessibility mapping supports governance of applicable requirements, not technical accessibility certification.
Suggested timing and triggers
Continuous operation; at lifecycle and change decisions; periodic management review, with an annual cycle as a suggested starting point.
Evidence examples
QMS procedures and responsibility matrix Lifecycle approval and change records Links to risk, data, testing and monitoring processes Review findings, corrective actions and closure evidence Documented basis for any permitted integration or simplification
How to check this control
Select a released or changed system and trace it through the QMS procedures. Check that responsible people completed required reviews and that an identified gap led to action. Do not treat possession of a QMS manual as proof of operation.
Related EU AI Act obligations
Article 16(l)
Ensure High-Risk AI Meets Applicable Accessibility Requirements
Article 17; Article 63(1)-(2)
Maintain a Quality Management System for High-Risk AI
Article 17(1)(a)
Maintain a Regulatory Compliance and High-Risk AI Modification Management Strategy
Sub-obligation of Article 17; Article 63(1)-(2): Maintain a Quality Management System for High-Risk AI
Article 17(1)(b)-(d)
Control High-Risk AI Design, Development, Quality Assurance, Testing and Validation
Sub-obligation of Article 17; Article 63(1)-(2): Maintain a Quality Management System for High-Risk AI
Article 17(1)(e)
Define Applicable Technical Specifications, Standards and Alternative Compliance Measures
Sub-obligation of Article 17; Article 63(1)-(2): Maintain a Quality Management System for High-Risk AI
Article 17(1)(f)
Maintain High-Risk AI Data Management Procedures
Sub-obligation of Article 17; Article 63(1)-(2): Maintain a Quality Management System for High-Risk AI
Article 17(1)(g)-(i)
Integrate Risk Management, Post-Market Monitoring and Serious Incident Reporting Into the QMS
Sub-obligation of Article 17; Article 63(1)-(2): Maintain a Quality Management System for High-Risk AI
Article 17(1)(j)-(k)
Maintain QMS Procedures for Regulatory Communications and Record-Keeping
Sub-obligation of Article 17; Article 63(1)-(2): Maintain a Quality Management System for High-Risk AI
Article 17(1)(l)-(m)
Maintain Adequate Resources and Management Accountability for High-Risk AI Compliance
Sub-obligation of Article 17; Article 63(1)-(2): Maintain a Quality Management System for High-Risk AI