Article 26(2)
UpcomingConditional timingAssign Qualified and Supported Human Oversight for High-Risk AI Use
Applies to Deployer; High-Risk AI.
- Actors
- Deployer
- AI class
- High-Risk AI
- Themes
- People & CultureGovernance & Accountability
Tracker Networks Guidance
Assign human oversight of the high-risk AI system to people who have the necessary competence, training and authority and ensure they receive the support needed to perform that role.
Official text
2. Deployers shall assign human oversight to natural persons who have the necessary competence, training and authority, as well as the necessary support.
Timing depends on the system
- 2 Dec 2027 — Article 6(2) / Annex III high-risk AI
- 2 Aug 2028 — Article 6(1) / Annex I Section A high-risk AI
- 2 Dec 2027 — Pre-existing Annex III high-risk AI type/model first placed on the market or put into service before 2027-12-02
- 2 Aug 2028 — Pre-existing Article 6(1) / Annex I high-risk AI type/model first placed on the market or put into service before 2028-08-02
- 2 Aug 2030 — Pre-existing high-risk AI intended to be used by public authorities
Suggested controls
Human Oversight Design and Enablement
Design systems and deployment guidance so qualified humans can monitor, interpret, override and safely stop high-risk AI.
High-Risk AI Deployment Governance
Govern deployer use against provider instructions, input-data requirements, monitoring, human oversight and escalation.
Related risks
Ineffective Human Oversight of AI
Human oversight may be nominal or ineffective because people lack authority, competence, information or usable intervention mechanisms.
Improper High-Risk AI Deployment
A deployer may operate high-risk AI contrary to provider instructions, without qualified oversight, suitable inputs or required monitoring.